INCB to Assess WHO’s Recommendations on Rescheduling CBD

The United Nations International Narcotics Control Board raised concerns as to whether all member nations could enforce the proposed changes.
Written by 
Luca Marani, Cannabis Educator.
|Last Updated:
Legal marijuana laws

As recently reported by Hemp Industry Daily, the WHO’s initiative to exempt plant-derived CBD products that contain less than 0.2% THC from international control under the UN’s 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs could be a difficult modification to enforce.

The World Health Organization’s stance

In early 2019, the WHO issued various statements in favor of reviewing the way in which cannabis is currently classified in the Single Convention on Narcotics Drugs and the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971. The U.N. Commission on Narcotic Drugs has gone public as for its intention to proceed to vote on the recommendations this December 2020. Therefore, the Vienna-based INCB carried out an analysis of what impact these six recommendations could have in various U.N. member countries. The INCB is an independent and “quasi-judicial” entity supervising the implementation of the U.N. narcotics conventions. The International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) noted how authorities in certain countries may not be equipped with the necessary technology or manpower to analyze the cannabinoid profile of CBD products – and this information would be vital and necessary to guarantee compliance with the proposed exemption.

How would these recommendations affect the CBD market landscape?

Of the six proposed scheduling changes, the most relevant for products containing plant-derived cannabidiol are Recommendation 5.4 and 5.5. Cannabidiol is not explicitly listed in international drug control treaties, but it is nonetheless included the 1961 convention, as a “preparation” and as an “extract or tincture” of marijuana.

Recommendation 5.4 argues for the deletion the “extracts and tinctures” category from Schedule I of the 1961 convention to reduce redundancy and repetition, while 5.5 suggests to add a footnote to the cannabis entry in the 1961 treaty, to specify that preparations that contain “predominantly” CBD and up to 0.2% THC should not fall under international control. This second recommendation stems from the WHO’s conclusion that CBD extracts do not have the risk of addiction or margin for abuse that the other substances mentioned in the treaties have.

These recommendations by the WHO have been received and welcomed from the medical marijuana and hemp industries, as a positive step toward the easing of the international control of cannabis. However, the main issue with them, according to the INCB, would be their “practical implementation at the national level”, because in most countries, conducting chemical analysis to the threshold indicated in the recommendation could not be possible. Besides the lack of access to this type of scientific technology for certain countries, the INCB manifested concerns even for those nations that would not have that type of problem, questioning whether this could be considered a smart resource expenditure.

Furthermore, the INCB also has worries in regards to the cultivation of cannabis cultivated with the purpose of CBD extraction. The board of INCB considers CBD would require monitoring, considering it does not meet the definition of cultivation for ‘industrial purpose’. When the cultivation of cannabis takes place with the goal of producing flowers, “then it should be considered under control regardless of the THC or CBD content”, said the President of INCB.

Luca Marani
Luca Marani
Cannabis Educator
Luca Marani is an educator and content creator from Italy. He graduated in 2017 from Universitat Pompeu Fabra in Barcelona, Spain, with a Master of Arts in Political Philosophy, writing a dissertation on what was the state of the medical cannabis legislative framework in Spain at the time, and how it affected the rights of the Spanish medical cannabis users community to dignity and quality of life.

Read More

Important Disclaimer
All contents of the LeafReport Site, such as text, graphics, images, and other material contained on the LeafReport Site are for informational purposes only. The Content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on the LeafReport Site!